Strategic commitments create material reliance on their intended outcomes. Most organizations cannot determine those outcomes objectively and must infer whether they have been achieved.

Existing governance can monitor execution, track delivery, and report progress. It does not determine whether the operating condition being relied upon has actually been established.

That is the determination gap Commitment Governance addresses.

Commitment Governance is the determination discipline for major commitments. It defines the Target State and determines whether it is achievable, achieved, and durable under conditions of material reliance.

The Four Questions of Oversight

Every board, executive sponsor, and oversight body asks four questions about major commitments. What has been missing is not the willingness to ask them, but the governed object and determination discipline required to answer them objectively.

1. What is the intended Target State?
2. Is the Target State still achievable?
3. Has the Target State been achieved?
4. Is the achieved Target State durable?

Why Existing Governance Falls Short

PMOs govern execution.
Risk manages exposure.
Finance governs capital.
Audit validates controls.
No function objectively determines whether the outcomes of strategic commitments are actually established.

A Discipline, Not a Report

It addresses a different enterprise problem: whether the operating condition being relied upon exists in practice, as determined through observable fact, defined criteria, and evidence.

Explore the Discipline